Hermon Research · Genome Intelligence

Hermon DNA

Hermon DNA studies actual nucleotide sequences with genome-native encoders and evidence-grounded reasoning. Unlike DOGMA, it is not an alternative architecture doctrine: transformers, state-space models, and implicit convolutions all compete on the same scientific evaluations.

Hermon DNA Encoder

A DNABERT-2-based sequence encoder and task heads. Current code includes deterministic data generation, sequence classification, LoRA/full fine-tuning options, and data gates.

Long-context research

HyenaDNA and Caduceus are comparison targets for single-nucleotide context, state-space mixing, bidirectionality, and reverse-complement equivariance.

Hermon instruction layer

A separate model turns retrieved evidence and structured predictions into explanations. It reports provenance, confidence, alternatives, and limitations.

Learning Stack

Sequence representation first, explanation second

Separating the encoder from the instruction model makes evaluation sharper: sequence predictions can be measured directly, while natural-language explanations can be checked for evidence fidelity.

01

Canonical sequence

Validate alphabet, ambiguity codes, provenance, coordinate system, and reverse-complement policy before a sequence enters training or evaluation.

02

Genome tokenizer

Compare single-nucleotide, fixed k-mer, and BPE representations under equal compute. Tokenization is an empirical decision, not a permanent doctrine.

03

Bidirectional encoder

Pretrain a DNABERT-style encoder with masked sequence objectives so every position can use upstream and downstream context.

04

Equivariance and long context

Test reverse-complement consistency and longer sequence mixers. Caduceus and HyenaDNA provide strong external baselines for these properties.

05

Scientific heads

Attach narrow, calibrated heads for motif, region, variant-effect, retrieval, and sequence-quality tasks with species- and chromosome-held-out splits.

06

Hermon reasoning bridge

A separate instruction model explains evidence, uncertainty, and limits. It must never convert an encoder score into unsupported biological certainty.

Pretraining Objectives

One model, several complementary signals

Masked sequence modelingRecover hidden spans from bidirectional context.

Reverse-complement consistencyPenalize incompatible states for equivalent strand views.

Contrastive region learningSeparate matched biological regions from GC- and length-matched hard negatives.

Multi-task supervisionShare an encoder while keeping task-specific heads, labels, uncertainty, and split rules explicit.

Retrieval-grounded instructionTrain explanations against cited evidence and structured encoder outputs rather than free-form imitation.

Benchmark Matrix

Accuracy without split discipline is not scientific progress

FamilyTasksRequired splitCritical failure
Representation

Masked nucleotide recovery, retrieval, clustering, linear probes

Species-, chromosome-, and family-held-out

Shortcut learning, tokenizer leakage, or embedding collapse

Invariance

Reverse-complement consistency, shift robustness, ambiguity handling

Paired original/reverse-complement and controlled perturbations

Predictions change when the biological meaning should not

Regulation

Promoter, enhancer, splice, chromatin, and motif benchmarks

Chromosome and cell-type holdouts where labels support them

GC-content or species identity explains the apparent gain

Variant effect

Calibrated ranking and classification of sequence perturbations

Gene-, locus-, and study-held-out with time-aware validation

High aggregate score with poor rare-class recall or calibration

Scientific reasoning

Evidence retrieval, uncertainty explanation, experimental critique

Source-isolated questions and adversarial unsupported claims

The instruction model invents causality from an encoder score

Research Boundary

Scientific assistance with explicit biological safeguards

Public Hermon DNA experiences prioritize sequence understanding, retrieval, simulation, and education. Biological design requests require risk classification and appropriate controls. Model confidence is not experimental validation, clinical evidence, or permission to act.

Core Reading

Encoder and long-context baselines